I cannot, cannot remember when the term is for an overuse of word to the point of its impotency.
Such as: "I'm starving," in which "starving" once had a very strong, very distinct connotation.
Or: "This noodle is terribly dry." Terrible = an adverbial modifier, no longer meaning actually "terrible"
Such as: "I'm starving," in which "starving" once had a very strong, very distinct connotation.
Or: "This noodle is terribly dry." Terrible = an adverbial modifier, no longer meaning actually "terrible"
-
Re: The Name of that Phenomenon
Wed, February 7, 2007 - 9:15 PMIs it semantic bleaching? -
-
Re: The Name of that Phenomenon
Thu, February 8, 2007 - 1:13 AMYes! I think so. Thanks.
-
-
Re: The Name of that Phenomenon
Thu, February 8, 2007 - 9:07 AMThat's awesome! :)
Craig in Arcata
-
Re: The Name of that Phenomenon
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 9:12 PMIndeed, the original denotation of the "starve" was 'to die'
(which is what the German equivalent, "sterben", still means).
I think semantic bleaching is the term you're looking for here,
though bleaching is not just something that leads to impotency.
It's also an essential part of the process by which grammatical
morphemes evolve. Thus the auxiliary "have" in the English
perfect (e.g. as in "I have climbed he greasy pole") has been bleached
of any sense of possession. And the "go" in "It's gonna rain tonight"
has lost its original motion sense.
But in none of these cases, or even in the case of "starve" or "terribly",
have these words become "impotent", exactly. In some ways, they're
even more powerful, since they all now have a much wider range
of applicability. -
-
Re: The Name of that Phenomenon
Sun, April 15, 2007 - 10:50 PMTrue that most modals have formed as a result of semantic bleaching, in that they now serve a grammatical purpose. "Impotency" was not at all the right word.
-