The Name of that Phenomenon

topic posted Wed, February 7, 2007 - 3:46 PM by  Meghan
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
I cannot, cannot remember when the term is for an overuse of word to the point of its impotency.
Such as: "I'm starving," in which "starving" once had a very strong, very distinct connotation.
Or: "This noodle is terribly dry." Terrible = an adverbial modifier, no longer meaning actually "terrible"
posted by:
Meghan
California
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: The Name of that Phenomenon

    Thu, April 12, 2007 - 9:12 PM
    Indeed, the original denotation of the "starve" was 'to die'
    (which is what the German equivalent, "sterben", still means).

    I think semantic bleaching is the term you're looking for here,
    though bleaching is not just something that leads to impotency.
    It's also an essential part of the process by which grammatical
    morphemes evolve. Thus the auxiliary "have" in the English
    perfect (e.g. as in "I have climbed he greasy pole") has been bleached
    of any sense of possession. And the "go" in "It's gonna rain tonight"
    has lost its original motion sense.

    But in none of these cases, or even in the case of "starve" or "terribly",
    have these words become "impotent", exactly. In some ways, they're
    even more powerful, since they all now have a much wider range
    of applicability.

Recent topics in "Linguistics"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
What is Skinner actually saying? Orangeboxman 0 October 29, 2009
OT: New Tribe Unsubscribed 0 April 19, 2009
anlaysing conversation esta 4 April 19, 2009
"Hamas", in Spanish ("never, never again"); in Zionazzi ("ham-... Michael 15 January 4, 2009