sacred geometry and langauge structure

topic posted Wed, January 12, 2005 - 11:49 PM by  Unsubscribed
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
A while back I came across this site: www.meru.org/

On it Stan Tenen has found that by shing light through a tetrahedron that has a phi ratio spiral in it, you can create a shadow of every english and hebrew letter.

So basically all of the letters of these languages are contained within the structure of the univere.

What I have been playing with is placing words on geometrical structures to give the meanings to the words.

I was just wondering if anyone out there has been playing with such things and what have you discovered?
posted by:
Unsubscribed
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: sacred geometry and langauge structure

    Fri, January 14, 2005 - 8:38 PM
    Hmm, maybe you should try it for yourself (or see it for yourself) before believing something so spectacular is true. If I said I could fly with nothing but happy thoughts would you believe me without first seeing with your own eyes? (barring any metaphorical stretching of what "flying" means) This is no different, his claim is pretty outrageous, but fortunately doens't see to hard to test for yourself. As the saying goes: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"
  • Re: sacred geometry and langauge structure

    Sat, January 15, 2005 - 5:43 AM
    anyone can figure out any arbitrary method for imbuing some meaning other than the socially accepted "agreement" meaning to words, but why on earth bother? "meaning" or function resides in the brain of the languaging individual and more or less corresponds to the "meaning" or function in other individuals using nearly the same set of arbitrary sounds and symbols. Beyond the sonic properties of the sounds and the morphology and orthology of the letters, the arbitrary sounds represented with arbitrary symbols, have no essential ontology subject to mathematical or geometric description, the great efforts of kabalists, numerologists, and others notwithstanding ... its a dead end for maping the "objective" world, but still manages to create a marvelously rich and apparently infinite world of abstraction which attracts many ... enjoy the Der Glasspearlenspeil, by all means, just don't fall for the illusion it offers
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: sacred geometry and langauge structure

      Sat, January 15, 2005 - 1:26 PM
      Ahhh, Mr Fish, we meet again.

      Let's just for a moment say that he discovered were actually true. Skepticism is necessary and a high level of critical thinking is admirable. When it cuts of exploration of ideas and what the possibilities are....

      If our language is imbedded within the very structure of the universe...seems pretty interesting to me.

      With all the information out there you cannot always check the evidence for yourself. You have to have some sort of filter. I assume that is ones values.

      But if your intuition cries out to you to pay attention to it...I just wondered if there was anyone playing with this out there, I wasn't that interested why you may think it is irrelevant.
      • Re: sacred geometry and langauge structure

        Sat, January 15, 2005 - 2:15 PM
        what's the difference between "the structure of the universe" and "the very structure of the universe"?
        and
        what does it mean to be "imbedded within" either?
        and what does "structure of the universe" mean anyway?
        language appears in the universe, to be sure: it appears amongst us who are part of it and made of the same stuff as it ...
        but language isn't made of that same stuff
        nor, apparently, is mathematics (a branch of language) made of that same stuff
        mixing categories creates too many problems for me
        i'd suggest some ontology before making the leap you seem to contemplate ... which isn't to say it doesn't present an enjoyable game ... go for all the gusto you can get! Beer is proof that God cares for his children.
        • Re: sacred geometry and langauge structure

          Sat, January 15, 2005 - 2:16 PM
          I should add, to Ben Franklin's observation, that abstraction has its joys, too.
          Didn't suggest anywhere the game was irrelevant ...
          • Unsu...
             

            Re: sacred geometry and langauge structure

            Sun, January 16, 2005 - 9:45 AM
            Well, its interesting how things turn out. Your scepticism was well grounded and both of you were giving me a message i needed to hear. I was in error in my interpretation and actually it is quite a large one.

            I contacted Stan Tenen becuase I thought he would be much better at sharing his work. I sent our 3 posts to him and this was his response which he gave permission to share with this group.

            >A while back I came across this site: <www.meru.org/>www.meru.org/
            >
            >On it Stan Tenen has found that by shing light through a tetrahedron that
            >has a phi ratio spiral in it, you can create a shadow of every english and
            >hebrew letter.

            This is not correct. What you're describing is what the US Federal
            District Court found to be the willful and malicious descriptions of my
            work produced by a plagiarist.

            First of all, I didn't find this. I designed it.

            Any wire coat hanger, bent to include two loops in 3-D, can make shadows
            that look like letters of just about any alphabet. What I designed was a
            _meaningful_ way to produce the letters of _particular_ Hebrew, Greek, and
            Arabic alphabets that fit the descriptions (but no pictures, of course) of
            the Hebrew, Christian, and Moslem traditions.

            The golden spiral, or phi spiral, as it's called, has nothing to do with
            this, and in fact, this claim is the primary abuse that was produced by the
            malicious plagiarist.

            Mr. Winter actually told me (and others), and it's in the sworn court
            record, that "My [Mr. Winter's] audiences are too stupid to know that I'm
            making up my claims about the golden spiral." So, this was deliberate
            fraud and abuse from day 1. Mr. Winter and his attorney also confessed to
            this in their sworn statement, and the court's and our experts also
            confirmed that there never was a golden or phi spiral in our design, and
            also that there never was, and still isn't, any golden or phi spiral in Mr.
            Winter's plagiary. (The experts found that Mr. Winter manually moved the
            data points from a real spiral until they matched my unique design. There
            is no math involved. What Mr. Winter did is pure "fudge".)

            There were no golden spirals in the ancient world, because algebra wasn't
            invented until Descartes. Thus, to claim a connection between the golden
            spiral and any alphabet would be completely anachronistic.

            Also, there isn't any one phi or golden spiral. There are an infinite
            number of golden spirals, and there are an infinite number of phi-based
            golden pseudo-spirals. The con artists like Mr. Winter would have us
            believe that the so-called phi or golden spiral is unique. It's not. It
            wasn't even known in the ancient world.

            And all spirals are defined only in two dimensions. There is no
            mathematical 3-dimensional form of the golden or phi spirals. This is
            another fraud. Most people think it's okay to pull a spiral into 3-D and
            that that's still math -- but it isn't. Mr. Winter and his attorney
            admitted this, and the court confirmed it.

            And even if there were a unique golden spiral, and even if it were known in
            the ancient world, it still would never have been associated with the
            alphabet, because these spirals only occur in the "death-trace" of living
            things, and because these spirals, like all log spirals, are "narcissistic".

            You can find an old paper on all of this at
            www.meru.org/goldmean.html .

            The spiral that I decided to start with, and that I decided how to pull
            into 3-D (not math, but personal design) is based on what I call the
            "embryonic spiral". It can be found in all ancient sources. It can be
            found under the Eye of Horus. It can be found in Babylonian friezes and
            sculpture. It can be found throughout the Greek world, especially at the
            top of all Ionic columns. It can be found throughout Leonardo's notebooks
            -- which contain no log or golden spirals whatsoever. It can be found
            throughout Christian iconography in a form related to the shepherd's
            crook. It can be found on Shang Dynasty pottery. It can be found
            throughout the illustrations in the Book of Kells.

            None of these has anything to do with phi, or the golden or pseudo-golden
            spirals.

            The spiral that I pull into 3-D was known throughout the ancient world,
            because it is entirely asymmetrical. It starts as a straight line, and
            ends as a perfect circle. This is not the narcissistic golden spiral that
            always circles itself in its own self-image (like Narcissus staring at his
            image in the water), but rather the most asymmetrical spiral that is
            constantly changing, growing, and transitioning. (Mr. Winter is a
            narcissist, according to the psychiatrists. This explains his fixation on
            the golden and phi spirals. It's kind of a "Freudian slip". <sigh>)

            As you may recall from my now-archival "Light in the Meeting Tent", at
            www.meru.org/lightintent/lightin.html , the tetrahedron,
            representing the meeting tent, is entirely symmetrical, which means that
            its complement, the "light", must be entirely asymmetrical.

            The phi, golden, and log spirals are the _most_ symmetric spirals. They're
            always self-similar. This disqualifies them. (Mr. Winter admitted under
            oath that this was the case, and thus what he was claiming was obviously
            wrong, and deliberately malicious. But he tells his followers that there
            is a conspiracy to "get" him, and he continues to claim that the golden
            spiral is meaningful with regard to the alphabet in public. This is vastly
            sick. <sigh>)

            Please read up on the sworn testimony and US Federal Court Findings and
            Orders. You can find almost everything at www.danwinter.com .
            Please also notice that Mr. Winter is a fugitive, with a Federal arrest
            warrant following him. He and his followers continue to act in
            "in-your-face" defiance of at least two independent US Federal Courts.

            Please help to set the record straight by accurately describing my designs,
            and distinguishing them from the malicious abuses and bastardizations
            produced by Mr. Winter, and repeated by his followers.

            Thanks for understanding. This is really important. All living geometry
            is based on integrity. It's necessary to protect the integrity of serious
            ideas, else they do not contribute to life, but instead, lead down to where
            it's cold, and dark, and dead. In order to fully appreciate models of
            integrity, it's necessary to act with integrity, and to let others know
            that this is a key to understanding these ideas and making use of them.

            If I'm right, this is part of a "science of consciousness", ergo, being
            accurate is important. <smile>

            >So basically all of the letters of these languages are contained within
            >the structure of the univere.

            No. First of all, there is nothing special about the English
            letters. Palmer script was created less than 200 years ago. Only the
            plagiarists are making claims for English, and they get away with it
            because, as I mentioned above, it is possible to make any letter shape,
            from any alphabet, from a wire coat hanger bent to include a couple of
            loops. When you can use anything to make anything, there's no meaning to
            any of it. That's why the Court found Mr. Winter's claim that my model
            makes English letters to be malicious. This exaggeration disparages the
            serious ideas I'm trying to present. (That's why Mr. Winter makes this
            false claim.)

            The only alphabets that fit the model that I designed are _particular_
            Hebrew, Greek, and Arabic alphabets. There is also a logical -- but not a
            shape -- connection to the Sanskrit/Vedic alphabet system. No other
            alphabets that I'm aware of fit this pattern. Exaggerated claims only
            reduce plausibility, and need to be avoided.

            However, in what I'm proposing, while the shape of letters, besides the
            particular Hebrew, Greek, and Arabic alphabets I'm working with, is pretty
            arbitrary, and has nothing to do with the structure of the universe, what
            I'm proposing does, in a sense, have to do with the structure of the
            universe. But that's a long discussion in itself.

            >What I have been playing with is placing words on geometrical structures
            >to give the meanings to the words.
            >
            >I was just wondering if anyone out there has been playing with such things
            >and what have you discovered?
            >

            Please let the others reading your message also read what I wrote above,
            and in this email. It's impossible for Meru Foundation to gain credibility
            and support when malicious and incorrect ideas are mixed in with what we're
            actually proposing. I'd guess you're not the only one who thinks there's
            little difference between Mr. Winter's deliberate distortions and abuse of
            my ideas and designs, and the real thing. The purpose of Mr. Winter's
            plagiary has been to discredit Meru Foundation, not to teach anything at
            all. Mr. Winter admitted to using anti-Semitism. He is mentally ill. Mr.
            Winter has fled the US, because he knows that if he appears in Federal
            Court again as ordered, he is going to have to face the testimony of
            a number of psychiatrists, who are likely to confirm that he is a
            narcissist, a pathological liar, and without feelings or compassion for
            anyone other than himself -- i.e., a psychopath. As the court orders
            confirm, Mr. Winter "gets his jollies" by hurting innocent people, and
            claiming to be the victim. Please don't let him get away with this. Our
            findings are serious, and have real implications that could be of great
            help to real people.

            >
            >I received the following 2 posts:
            >
            > Hmm, maybe you should try it for yourself (or see it for yourself)
            > before believing something so spectacular is true. If I said I could fly
            > with nothing but happy thoughts would you believe me without first seeing
            > with your own eyes? (barring any metaphorical stretching of what "flying"
            > means) This is no different, his claim is pretty outrageous, but
            > fortunately doens't see to hard to test for yourself. As the saying goes:
            > "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"
            >
            >

            Please send this person this message. Thanks.

            >anyone can figure out any arbitrary method for imbuing some meaning other
            >than the socially accepted "agreement" meaning to words, but why on earth
            >bother? "meaning" or function resides in the brain of the languaging
            >individual and more or less corresponds to the "meaning" or function in
            >other individuals using nearly the same set of arbitrary sounds and
            >symbols. Beyond the sonic properties of the sounds and the morphology and
            >orthology of the letters, the arbitrary sounds represented with arbitrary
            >symbols, have no essential ontology subject to mathematical or geometric
            >description, the great efforts of kabalists, numerologists, and others
            >notwithstanding ... its a dead end for maping the "objective" world, but
            >still manages to create a marvellously rich and apparently infinite world
            >of abstraction which attracts many ... enjoy the Der Glasspearlenspeil, by
            >all means, just don't fall for the illusion it offers
            >

            This is an appropriate response, from an intelligent and skeptical
            person. If this person knew what I was actually proposing, their response
            might be more positive. But as it is, it's a good example of how my ideas,
            when distorted, lose their credibility and lead to the sort of response
            above.

            Please send this person this message also.

            And BTW, if anyone reading this would like more info on what I'm actually
            proposing, and what the Meru designs of "living geometry" are really about,
            please feel free to email me directly, and I will respond.

            It's really good when the wrong-headed ideas that Mr. Winter has spread are
            rejected. But they should be rejected as Mr. Winter's foolishness, and
            deliberate attempts at discrediting my ideas, and not as representative of
            my ideas. What I'm proposing is defendable, sensible, and plausible. When
            you accept what Mr. Winter has imposed on my work, then he gets his jollies
            for having succeeded in damaging the credibility of my work. I hope you
            can see how destructive this is.

Recent topics in "Linguistics"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
What is Skinner actually saying? Orangeboxman 0 October 29, 2009
OT: New Tribe Unsubscribed 0 April 19, 2009
anlaysing conversation esta 4 April 19, 2009
"Hamas", in Spanish ("never, never again"); in Zionazzi ("ham-... Michael 15 January 4, 2009