linguistics background

topic posted Wed, June 29, 2005 - 9:31 AM by  Unsubscribed
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
I was wondering about the linguistics background of the members of this tribe. How many of you have a formal education in linguistics? Applied or theoretical? Or are you just interested? As for me, I have bachelors degree in theoretical linguistics and Spanish from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Let me know, thanks
posted by:
Unsubscribed
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: linguistics background

    Wed, June 29, 2005 - 12:39 PM
    I have a wierd master's from CU, that is effectivly religio-Linguistical Anthropology or some such nonsense. Basically, the Native American Studys dpt and the Linguistics dept allowed me to design my own degree that specialized in the relationship between language and religion within native tribes.

    Basically, were i a dog, i'd be a mutt. :-)
  • Re: linguistics background

    Thu, July 14, 2005 - 1:14 PM
    BA in Linguistics from Ohio State, 1982.

    Have done little with it except contrive a cool spelling for my name and apply my phonetics training to my singing. Definitely a "word person," though.

    I thought I was interested in TESOL at the time, but never followed through with it. If I weren't snowed under with school debt now, I might consider going back to TESOL, but I'm more likely to go into Journalism if I ever go back to school.
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: linguistics background

      Fri, July 15, 2005 - 12:32 PM
      My undergraduate minor is in linguistics (1991). It's always fascinated me (my other minor is in anthropology), but I could never figure out what it could be used for in terms of generating an income. It sort of sat in my mind, fed by occasional library books on the subject, until recently when I moved to China for a year to teach English. That's when I was able to really apply some of what I learned (and be amazed at myself for even remembering any of it).
  • Re: linguistics background

    Fri, July 15, 2005 - 4:51 PM
    B.A. University of Utah 1983 Linguistics, 1986 German

    I first started my German degree in 1978, having learned a little in high school. Then I went to Germany and really learned to speak it. Upon returning, I started studying French, Russian, Japanese, Mandarin, ASL. A friend of mine suggested I take Linguistics 101 and I was hooked! I blasted through their classes as fast as I could and even took graduate level classes because they were cool! Dreaded German (a fully literature-based degree) had only a few classes I even liked- Middle High German, History of the German Language, Old High German, no surprise. I hated having to read Büchner and Mann without having any interest. But, Linguistics just grabbed me.
    Two of my old professors, Drs. Dave Iannucci and Marianna DePaolo are still there.
    My favorite studies included dialectology, sociolinguists, and phonology. I really liked the transformational syntax, too, but I did lousy on tests!

    Craig in Arcata
  • Re: linguistics background

    Sun, July 17, 2005 - 5:31 PM
    Go Slugs!
    Gawd - yes, I too am the product [or is it by-product?] of the UCSC Linguistics department (Cowell '86), but don't hold it against 'em.

    My BA was ostensibly focused on applied linguisics, with the eventual plan to become an English teacher.* The course catalog at the time made it seem like the Linguistics people were in cahoots with the English department in its applied linguistics offerings - but when I asked then-chair Jorge Hankamer** about this my first year there, he was surprised that any connection had been made in the catalog. And yet, that same language remained in the catalog four years later when I left. (And with no known change of program to accomplish such a connection.)

    Other than writing a couple of articles for the quarterly magazine of the Exploratorium [a science museum in San Francisco] on the history of English spelling and on the 'how' and 'why' of "foreign accents," I have almost completely avoided having to dip into the dark memories of my studies. Well, except for the occasional language anecdote for a party. (And I STILL believe that linguistics makes for one of the best cocktail majors around.)

    *I ended up getting my credential to teach social studies
    **Is he still around? Is he still stoic? And does he still play soccer?
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: linguistics background

      Sun, July 17, 2005 - 7:34 PM
      Hankamer is still around, but only seemed to teach the graduate students.
      • Re: linguistics background

        Mon, July 18, 2005 - 6:34 PM
        I'm working on a BA in Communication Studies with lots of linguistics mixed in, at the moment. Planning on doing an MA in theoretical linguistics next year, preferably discourse analysis with a pretentiously political slant to it. I liked pragmatics and sociolinguistics a lot, still have to take syntax and phonetics this year. I'm constantly surrounded by linguistics people, including my supervisor at the moment. I like them a lot!
        • Re: linguistics background

          Thu, July 21, 2005 - 3:30 PM
          I have a BA in Linguistics from the University of Pittsburgh...

          +hard
          -useful

          or is that just me?
          • Re: linguistics background

            Thu, July 21, 2005 - 5:54 PM
            Became interested in Linguistics after an advanced compilers class.
            • Re: linguistics background

              Thu, July 21, 2005 - 8:03 PM
              damn - now I feel suddenly not so ept - i am a total amateur with linguisitcs - but I've always been fascinated by etymology - and I am a poet and writer who loves every word I can find and am constantly making up new ones - today gregarity just spat out of me - from gegarious

              or things like discoverng the french cognate for undulate
          • Re: linguistics background

            Fri, July 22, 2005 - 7:31 AM
            "+hard
            -useful

            or is that just me?"

            I found linguistics to be moderately difficult and very useful. It depends, I suppose, on how you define useful. If you mean remunerationwise, the usual wisdom is that you need a PhD before you start to see returns. I find linguistis useful because I've always enjoyed the study of language and especially how languages change over time.

            For the record, I got my AB in linguistics at Berkeley in '79, and enjoyed it during and after.
            • Re: linguistics background

              Mon, July 25, 2005 - 12:45 AM
              That was a joke many of us had at Pitt. I actually found it to be quite fascinating and not too difficult. I actually scored the best on the final in Syntax (tooting my own horn :) I just don't know what to do with it now. I guess a PhD would be more useful.
              • Re: linguistics background

                Mon, July 25, 2005 - 8:50 AM
                Amateur here.
                Got into linguistics from my philosophical studies which was my major at Northwestern. It all came home with Sausure's "A Course in General Linguistics". Around the Sixties, my era, Noam Chomsky was a big hit, so along with Mehr Baba, Bakunin, Gurdijieff, "Be Here Now(forgot the author),and a host of other stuff(during the Sixties, people read everything: including Stewart Brand's "Whole Earth Catalog), I had to cut my teeth on transformational grammar, which led to the Whorfian hypothesis(Benjamin Whorf) and later more formal linguistics work. Anyone familiar with twentieth century philosophy knows that language has become a pivotal aspect of philosophical inquiry(Austin, Searle, Wittgenstein, later Husserl, Ricoeur, Gadamer, Heidegger, Ryle, Strawson) and all those guys doing "ordinary language philosophy" or the dreaded logical positivists(Nagel, Carnap, that gang).
                During the seventies I discovered an amazing book by Fredrick Bodmer titled the "Loom of Language" which really got me going. I had two years of Latin in high school and taught myself rudimentary Homeric Greek with a good friend who studied the "Gospel of John" and "Odysseus" in Greek. French, Spanish, Italian I learned to read but still have a hard time understanding it when it is spoken. Also, took two years of Russian in college with the intent of reading the original Lenin. German I find the hardest but recently I have come to understand that if I think in the "expected word order", for example, 'I you love' of the language I am studying I can get by instead of expecting the expected English order and then trying to translate it on the fly. All in all, I love languages. Most philosophers are very conversant with French and German which I wish I knew more of but you just have so much time. However, everyone of the linguistics people I have met were totally awesome, many honkering down with Icelandic, Gaelic, Twi, (I learned a little Swahilli when it was fashionable but I forgot it all), Hausa, and the incredibly difficult American Indian languages. There is a black intellectual, McWhorter, at U of Cal whose politics I have trouble with but who seems to have a good understanding of the nature of creole languages which seem fascinating.

                One day I am really going to get my language act together, but it has been a hodge-podge of a little here, a little there. Since I've been out of school, I don't run into alot of people who like to talk about linguistics, much less language. As a "political progressive" I find the times today quite stultifying and intellectualism is kind of a "closet" affair.

                Gilton
            • Re: linguistics background

              Sun, August 14, 2005 - 8:30 AM
              Victory! I think you are the man I was looking for. Could you check my thoughts on compounds in Linguistics tribe. I think, we need help there. Looking forward...
          • Re: linguistics background

            Sat, September 10, 2005 - 7:51 AM
            "+hard
            -useful

            or is that just me?"

            To complicate the marked categories used here:

            ++ hard ["double plus" not "plus plus"]
            + useful [better than algebra & geometry combined once I started applying (counter-) feeding &/or (counter-) bleeding labels to non-linguistic rule-ordering relationships

            Transformation Grammar (Syntax I & II in the Hankamerian mode) 'bout brought me to tears and/or fisticuffs, and did nothing to make me butch. I would've switched majors if I hadn't been so stubborn. I really appreciated phonology, phonetics, and most of the historical linguistics I studied - especially after all the pounding in my head subsided.
  • Re: linguistics background

    Tue, July 26, 2005 - 6:03 PM
    I got an AB at Berkeley in Linguistic, Syntax and Symantics with a special study in Ancient American Indian Languages in 1983. Other than read an article or reread sections of books I found interesting at school, haven't been able to use the degree much at all. Pity, I found it really interesting.
  • Re: linguistics background

    Wed, July 27, 2005 - 4:27 PM
    errrr.... none whatsoever. The only reason I'm stating it is so that my future posts will be taken as those of a layman who simply has a penchant for the use, structure, evolution and to an extent the history of the English language. Let's just say that I'm an apprentice wordsmith.

    T
  • Re: linguistics background

    Sun, August 14, 2005 - 12:01 PM
    Just interested. My intro to linguistics was through hybrid ling/english courses at Berkeley. Linguist Kristen Hanson is one of my favorite professors for studying metrics in poetry, and Anne Banfield's work on Virginia Woolf ("free indirect style") was also impressive.

    What I enjoy most about the field in general are morphology, phonology, and syntax, and how in particular a general knowlege of these things has greatly enhanced my enjoyment of poetry.
    • Re: linguistics background

      Thu, August 18, 2005 - 9:17 PM
      I have an undergraduate degree in Japanese Studies, and an MA in Linguistics with a concentration in phonetics. I used it to teach ESL and the university level where I would do a contrastive analysis of the students' native language with American English and design a personalized curriculum for accent reduction.

      Later I become an editor.

      I love sociolinguistics and in particular, American dialects and accents. My dream is to use this to become a dialect coach, but I have no idea how to get started. Any ideas?
      • Re: linguistics background

        Sat, August 20, 2005 - 9:26 PM
        I want to be one when I grow up.
        • Re: linguistics background

          Wed, October 19, 2005 - 8:34 AM
          I am still a student of linguistics, applied to be exact. My main interest is not teaching however, but a more (general linguistic) sociological and psychological approach. I'm fascinited by sign languages.
          I'm studying at Nijmegen University, Netherlands
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: linguistics background

    Wed, October 19, 2005 - 8:57 AM
    BA in English with Creative Writing emphasis from UC Davis, just started my MA program in TESOL at Cal State Sacramento. Goal to teach in community college.
    • Re: linguistics background

      Thu, October 20, 2005 - 10:00 AM
      BA in Celtic Studies, Queen's Uni, Belfast. The focus was on Celtic Languages of the last 2000 years, Old, Middle and Modern Irish especially. Welsh, Breton, Manx, Scots Gaeilc and Cornish were also a part of it.

      Part of the course I enjoyed the most was the phonetics classes and it served as an intro to the IPA...From there, like my da, I'm 'chancing my arm' at a lot of this.
  • Re: linguistics background

    Sat, October 22, 2005 - 2:57 AM
    BS in Spanish and linguistics from Georgetown, 1978, studies under Robert Lado, Muriel Saville-Troike, etc. I haven't done a darn thing with it since, although the Spanish and my other languages have come in endlessly handy in all sorts of ways in life. I actually thought I'd wasted my whole education on the linguistics end of things until Deborah Tannen came into the picture, and then I realized I'd been doing sociolinguistics on my own for years, just for kicks.

    Wendy
  • Re: linguistics background

    Thu, October 27, 2005 - 11:43 AM
    Playing with semantics, I consider that the formal education the day they start to tell us, say papa, say mom, and off we go as linguists. I always have considered everybody a linguist since in any conversation there is a topic on linguistics. It is amazing how many people discuss about it, and then you read those great dissertations to get a degree, how funny life is. Anyway, BA of General Linguistics from the Andre Martinet school in Paris and then several research papers in Sweden from a mix of logicians and linguists. Now, all that is history and it is today where I start to have an online posting about linguistics.

    Thanks
  • Re: linguistics background

    Tue, November 1, 2005 - 10:24 AM
    Applied linguistics here. Was gonna teach but ended up becoming an acupuncturist. I credit the class "histor of chinese language" for proding me into this :)
  • Re: linguistics background

    Wed, November 2, 2005 - 6:44 PM
    Just thought I should tell you that I have no academic background in linguistics, but. . .
    I have a great love for words; I always looks for just the right word to use when I am writing something; and I will on occasion use words that some people may - if they care enough - have to go to the dictionary in order to find their meanings. I go to the dictionary myself quite often. Paula
  • Re: linguistics background

    Mon, December 5, 2005 - 7:15 AM
    I studied ethno-linguistic anthropology and collect languages as a hobby.
    I speak about 6 to varying degrees of incoherence and have smatterings in lots more.
    It's both an academic background and a passion for me.
    Hugs,
    Yasir

Recent topics in "Linguistics"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
What is Skinner actually saying? Orangeboxman 0 October 29, 2009
OT: New Tribe Unsubscribed 0 April 19, 2009
anlaysing conversation esta 4 April 19, 2009
"Hamas", in Spanish ("never, never again"); in Zionazzi ("ham-... Michael 15 January 4, 2009