<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Any Linguistics students focusing on syntax? - Linguistics - tribe.net</title>
    <link>http://linguistica.tribe.net/thread/eb5993fb-0d4d-400c-896e-1c74944934ae?format=rss</link>
    <description>Tribe.net. Local Connections</description>
    <item>
      <title>Any Linguistics students focusing on syntax?</title>
      <link>http://linguistica.tribe.net/thread/eb5993fb-0d4d-400c-896e-1c74944934ae#0f0f1a10-0e2b-4a28-a5ee-8a29cf6e9ba4</link>
      <description>Anyone here majoring in linguistics and focusing on syntax? I'm looking to collaborate on a theory of, I suppose, psycholinguistics, but really more a single all encompassing theory that can describe the transformation of a theoretical semantic object (supposed to be the cognitive representation of a sentence meaning) into phonological forms of the sentence, including morphology and syntax in this single theory. My aim is to avoid the current model of theories, and instead have a theory that describes some mathematical function that maps abstract meanings to concrete phoneme strings. Anyone interested?</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 06:43:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://linguistica.tribe.net/thread/eb5993fb-0d4d-400c-896e-1c74944934ae#0f0f1a10-0e2b-4a28-a5ee-8a29cf6e9ba4</guid>
      <dc:creator>Darryl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-16T06:43:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>



